On Tue, Jun 28, 2016 at 2:21 PM, Andy Lutomirski <l...@amacapital.net> wrote: > > Or are you > suggesting that we actually make a list somewhere of stacks that are > nominally unused but are still around for RCU's benefit and then > scavenge from that lest when we need a new stack?
Yes. We'd have to make our own list (rather than just use the RCU list
itself where everything goes), but..
> If so, that seems considerably more complicated than just adding a reference
> count.
Fair enough.
Linus
