> But nothing quite obviously setting these upstream. I'm probably just > missing something obvious though. Either way I figured now would be a > good time to ask as I have other code that would use this, the linker > table stuff I've been working. If we can avoid propagating more use of > LTO_REFERENCE_INITCALL() then great. If we still need it its probably > good to document this a bit more as can't see anything super clear.
It was a work around for a gcc 4.7 LTO problem. I guess it could be dropped by now. Yes I've been slow in submitting the LTO patches, even though they have a quite active out of tree user base. Will try to do better. -Andi
