On 06/23, Andy Lutomirski wrote: > > That sounds a bit more fragile than I'm really comfortable with, > although it'll at least oops reliably if we get it wrong. > > But I'm planning on moving ti->flags (and the rest of thread_info, > either piecemeal or as a unit) into task_struct on architectures that > opt in,
I agree, this looks better. probably it should not be that hard to fix GET_THREAD_INFO/etc, but you know this much better than me. Oleg.
