Darren Salt wrote:
>
> Your patch was mangled by Thunderbird. IME, it always does this; you should
> attach patches, not include them inline.
>
> Still, it was easy enough to apply the patch manually.
>
It's braindead, I was lazy and hoping it wouldn't crap things up too
badly. (it usually works if the lines are short enough)
>> I'd appreciate if you could test this sooner rather than later as the merge
>> window is just around the corner.
>
> It doesn't work.
>
> After applying my patch and fixing up the rejects, it still doesn't work. I
> need to disable the first of the writeb() calls mentioned in the last hunk of
> your patch for it to work again. I have the impression that the hardware
> doesn't like the power-on bit not being set :-|
>
Now this isn't good. It means that I have to controllers that require
conflicting deviations from the standard. What a pain.
> ... hmm, it looks like there's a small bug in my patch: the label "out" needs
> to be before the last writeb() otherwise, if power is -1, no write will
> happen regardless. I'm attaching a fixed version along with an adapted
> version of your patch.
>
I already fixed up that before I committed it to my tree, so no sweat. )
> Pierre, if you're happy to sign off the modified version of your patch, feel
> free to convert my not-yet-signed-off-by into a normal signed-off-by.
>
I'll rework that into a separate quirk to indicate it's because of
broken hardware. It's only for unreleased hw so it's no rush. I just
wanted to see if it was related to your problem.
Rgds
--
-- Pierre Ossman
Linux kernel, MMC maintainer http://www.kernel.org
PulseAudio, core developer http://pulseaudio.org
rdesktop, core developer http://www.rdesktop.org
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
