Hi!
> The sensor is found in Nokia N900 main camera
>
> Signed-off-by: Ivaylo Dimitrov <ivo.g.dimitrov...@gmail.com>
> +/*
> + *
> + * Register access helpers
> + *
> + */
> +
> +/*
> + * Read a 8/16/32-bit i2c register. The value is returned in 'val'.
> + * Returns zero if successful, or non-zero otherwise.
> + */
Turn the first comment into "normal" comment style, and merge the two
comments?
> +static int et8ek8_i2c_read_reg(struct i2c_client *client, u16 data_length,
> + u16 reg, u32 *val)
> +{
> + int r;
> + struct i2c_msg msg[1];
Uff. That's a bit non-traditional. Use plain "struct i2c_msg msg;" if
you have just one?
> + /* Now we start writing ... */
> + r = et8ek8_i2c_buffered_write_regs(client, regs, cnt);
> +
> + /* ... and then check that everything was OK */
> + if (r < 0) {
> + dev_err(&client->dev, "i2c transfer error !!!\n");
> + return r;
I'd reduce number of "!"s in the message.
> + /*
> + * If we ran into a sleep statement when going through
> + * the list, this is where we snooze for the required time
> + */
> + if (next->type == ET8EK8_REG_DELAY) {
> + set_current_state(TASK_UNINTERRUPTIBLE);
> + schedule_timeout(msecs_to_jiffies(next->val));
Open-coded set_current_state(), and no restore, makes me
suspicious. Can msleep() be used here?
> +{
> + int r;
> + struct i2c_msg msg[1];
I'd avoid array for single entry. (You'll need to make it &msg below,
but...)
> +/*
> + * Return time of one row in microseconds, .8 fixed point format.
> + * If the sensor is not set to any mode, return zero.
> + */
typedef int fixedfp; then use it where .8 fixed point is used?
> +static int et8ek8_set_test_pattern(struct et8ek8_sensor *sensor, s32 mode)
> +{
...
> + rval = et8ek8_i2c_write_reg(client, ET8EK8_REG_8BIT, 0x111B,
> + tp_mode << 4);
> + if (rval)
> + goto out;
> +
> + rval = et8ek8_i2c_write_reg(client, ET8EK8_REG_8BIT, 0x1121,
> + cbh_mode << 7);
> + if (rval)
> + goto out;
> +
> + rval = et8ek8_i2c_write_reg(client, ET8EK8_REG_8BIT, 0x1124,
> + cbv_mode << 7);
> + if (rval)
> + goto out;
> +
> + rval = et8ek8_i2c_write_reg(client, ET8EK8_REG_8BIT, 0x112C, din_sw);
> + if (rval)
> + goto out;
> +
> + rval = et8ek8_i2c_write_reg(client, ET8EK8_REG_8BIT, 0x1420, r1420);
> +
> +out:
> + return rval;
> +}
I'd avoid gotos when all it does is return.
> +/*
> + *
> + * Stingray sensor mode settings for Scooby
> + *
> + *
> + */
I'd fix it to normal comment style... and possibly remove it. Can you
understand what it says?
> + },
> + .regs = {
> + { ET8EK8_REG_8BIT, 0x1239, 0x4F }, /* */
> + { ET8EK8_REG_8BIT, 0x1238, 0x02 }, /* */
> + { ET8EK8_REG_8BIT, 0x123B, 0x70 }, /* */
> + { ET8EK8_REG_8BIT, 0x123A, 0x05 }, /* */
> + { ET8EK8_REG_8BIT, 0x121B, 0x63 }, /* */
> + { ET8EK8_REG_8BIT, 0x1220, 0x85 }, /* */
> + { ET8EK8_REG_8BIT, 0x1221, 0x00 }, /* */
> + { ET8EK8_REG_8BIT, 0x1222, 0x58 }, /* */
> + { ET8EK8_REG_8BIT, 0x1223, 0x00 }, /* */
> + { ET8EK8_REG_8BIT, 0x121D, 0x63 }, /* */
> + { ET8EK8_REG_8BIT, 0x125D, 0x83 }, /* */
> + { ET8EK8_REG_TERM, 0, 0}
> + }
I'd remove the empty comments...
> +struct et8ek8_meta_reglist meta_reglist = {
> + .version = "V14 03-June-2008",
Do we need the version?
> + .reglist = {
> + { .ptr = &mode1_poweron_mode2_16vga_2592x1968_12_07fps },
> + { .ptr = &mode1_16vga_2592x1968_13_12fps_dpcm10_8 },
> + { .ptr = &mode3_4vga_1296x984_29_99fps_dpcm10_8 },
> + { .ptr = &mode4_svga_864x656_29_88fps },
> + { .ptr = &mode5_vga_648x492_29_93fps },
> + { .ptr = &mode2_16vga_2592x1968_3_99fps },
> + { .ptr = &mode_648x492_5fps },
> + { .ptr = &mode3_4vga_1296x984_5fps },
> + { .ptr = &mode_4vga_1296x984_25fps_dpcm10_8 },
> + { .ptr = 0 }
> + }
> +};
I'd say .ptr = NULL.
> +struct v4l2_mbus_framefmt;
> +struct v4l2_subdev_pad_mbus_code_enum;
> +
> +struct et8ek8_mode {
> + /* Physical sensor resolution and current image window */
> + __u16 sensor_width;
> + __u16 sensor_height;
> + __u16 sensor_window_origin_x;
> + __u16 sensor_window_origin_y;
> + __u16 sensor_window_width;
> + __u16 sensor_window_height;
If this can not be included from userland, convert __uX -> uX.
> +#define ET8EK8_MAX_LEN 32
> +struct et8ek8_meta_reglist {
> + char version[ET8EK8_MAX_LEN];
> + union {
> + struct et8ek8_reglist *ptr;
> + } reglist[];
> +};
What is going on here? union with single entry is strange...
(And thanks for doing all the work.)
Best regards,
Pavel
--
(english) http://www.livejournal.com/~pavelmachek
(cesky, pictures)
http://atrey.karlin.mff.cuni.cz/~pavel/picture/horses/blog.html
