On Wed, Jun 01, 2016 at 10:35:57AM +0100, Ian Abbott wrote:
> On 01/06/16 10:19, Ashwin Ravichandran wrote:
> > Fixed a coding style issue.
> > 
> > Signed-off-by: Ashwin Ravichandran <ashwinravichandra...@gmail.com>
> > ---
> >   drivers/staging/comedi/drivers/addi-data/hwdrv_apci3501.c | 2 +-
> >   drivers/staging/comedi/drivers/addi_apci_3501.c           | 4 ++--
> >   2 files changed, 3 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
> > 
> > diff --git a/drivers/staging/comedi/drivers/addi-data/hwdrv_apci3501.c 
> > b/drivers/staging/comedi/drivers/addi-data/hwdrv_apci3501.c
> > index 3757074..9c27999 100644
> > --- a/drivers/staging/comedi/drivers/addi-data/hwdrv_apci3501.c
> > +++ b/drivers/staging/comedi/drivers/addi-data/hwdrv_apci3501.c
> > @@ -28,7 +28,7 @@ static int apci3501_config_insn_timer(struct 
> > comedi_device *dev,
> >         data[0] != ADDIDATA_TIMER)
> >             return -EINVAL;
> > 
> > -   devpriv->tsk_Current = current;
> > +   devpriv->tsk_current = current;
> > 
> >     devpriv->timer_mode = data[0];
> > 
> > diff --git a/drivers/staging/comedi/drivers/addi_apci_3501.c 
> > b/drivers/staging/comedi/drivers/addi_apci_3501.c
> > index 40ff914..b2f6712 100644
> > --- a/drivers/staging/comedi/drivers/addi_apci_3501.c
> > +++ b/drivers/staging/comedi/drivers/addi_apci_3501.c
> > @@ -68,7 +68,7 @@
> >   struct apci3501_private {
> >     unsigned long amcc;
> >     unsigned long tcw;
> > -   struct task_struct *tsk_Current;
> > +   struct task_struct *tsk_current;
> >     unsigned char timer_mode;
> >   };
> > 
> > @@ -273,7 +273,7 @@ static irqreturn_t apci3501_interrupt(int irq, void *d)
> >     }
> > 
> >     /* Enable Interrupt Send a signal to from kernel to user space */
> > -   send_sig(SIGIO, devpriv->tsk_Current, 0);
> > +   send_sig(SIGIO, devpriv->tsk_current, 0);
> >     ctrl = inl(devpriv->tcw + ADDI_TCW_CTRL_REG);
> >     ctrl &= ~(ADDI_TCW_CTRL_GATE | ADDI_TCW_CTRL_TRIG |
> >               ADDI_TCW_CTRL_IRQ_ENA);
> > 
> 
> The patch looks fine (although this odd-ball Comedi driver shouldn't really
> be sending signals to a user-space task!).

Yeah, that's really odd, fixing that would be nice...

Reply via email to