From: Matt Wilson <m...@amzn.com> Date: Tue, 14 Jun 2016 23:23:36 -0700
> Point taken, though existing drivers (even fairly popular ones) also > aren't as clean as you might like. A quick look around... Existing drivers do undesirable things, film at 11... Yet are never a reason to accept such things in new drivers. > Like many other network drivers, some of this is common code used for > non-Linux systems, and that's why there is some overlap with Linux > facilities. Again, never an excuse for such things. > Are there other things that jump out at you? I review hundreds of patches a day, I invested what I was able to before moving on to other people's work. Other developers must help review such a large driver submission, it can't all be on me.
