On 06/15/2016 11:11 AM, Michael Ellerman wrote: > On Wed, 2016-08-06 at 16:54:27 UTC, "Shreyas B. Prabhu" wrote: >> pnv_init_idle_states discovers supported idle states from the >> device tree and does the required initialization. Set power_save >> function pointer only after this initialization is done > > This looks like a bug fix? Or is this not a concern in practice for some > reason > (and if so what is that reason)? >
This isn't a concern currently because, all powernv machines so far supported nap and nap does not need any initialization from kernel side. Thanks, Shreyas
