Stephen Rothwell <[email protected]> writes: > Hi Kevin, > > On Sun, 5 Jun 2016 20:40:28 -0700 Kevin Hilman <[email protected]> wrote: >> >> Not forgotten, but merged through Philip's reset tree, which I thought >> was already in linux-next. Sorry about that. > > It may well be, but we dislike implicit dependencies between trees ... > it makes the merge order matter :-( What you should have is a common > non-rebasing branch that both trees merge.
Yup, I'll work this out with Philipp. Kevin
