On Wed, 8 Jun 2016, Michal Hocko wrote: > > Why is the patch asking users to report oom killing of a process that > > raced with setting /proc/pid/oom_score_adj to OOM_SCORE_ADJ_MIN? What is > > possibly actionable about it? > > Well, the primary point is to know whether such races happen in the real > loads and whether they actually matter. If yes we can harden the locking > or come up with a less racy solutions.
A thread being set to oom disabled while racing with the oom killer obviously isn't a concern: it could very well be set to oom disabled after the SIGKILL is sent and before the signal is handled, and that's not even fixable without unneeded complexity because we don't know the source of the SIGKILL. Please remove the printk entirely.
