On Wed, 31 Jan 2007, Michal Piotrowski wrote:
> On 31/01/07, Robert P. J. Day <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >
> > Centralize the kernel config option for debugging semaphores and
> > modify the macro for frv to use that config option instead.
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Robert P. J. Day <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> [..]
> > +config DEBUG_SEMAPHORE
> > + bool "Semaphore debugging"
> > + depends on DEBUG_KERNEL
> > + default n
> > + help
> > + If you say Y here then semaphore processing will issue lots of
> > + verbose debugging messages. If you suspect a semaphore problem or
> > a
> > + kernel hacker asks for this option then say Y. Otherwise say N.
> > +
> > + At the moment, this is implemented only by alpha and frv.
>
> IMHO this option should stay in arch/{alpha,frv}/Kconfig.debug
any particular reason? and note that it's currently *not* in
arch/frv/Kconfig.debug -- it's hard-coded with a macro name that's not
the same as the config option, and i don't really see the advantage of
having each architecture implement precisely the same feature in
different and incompatible ways. but i'm willing to be convinced
otherwise.
rday
--
========================================================================
Robert P. J. Day
Linux Consulting, Training and Annoying Kernel Pedantry
Waterloo, Ontario, CANADA
http://www.fsdev.dreamhosters.com/wiki/index.php?title=Main_Page
========================================================================
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
