Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
On Tuesday, 30 January 2007 22:20, Nigel Cunningham wrote:
Hi.
On Tue, 2007-01-30 at 14:57 +0000, Avi Kivity wrote:
Add the necessary callbacks to suspend and resume a host running kvm. This
is just a repeat of the cpu hotplug/unplug work.
Signed-off-by: Avi Kivity <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Maybe it's just a lack of understanding, but I'm wondering if this patch
is necessary - we already hot-unplug secondary cpus prior to suspending
devices.
The on_each_cpu() in the patch really means on_this_cpu().
Not with the reoredering patches that are in -mm, though. With these patches,
the nonboot CPUs are disabled after "regular" devices.
After that, it means on_each_cpu() again, and the hotplug patch becomes
unnecessary (except to support hotplug, of course).
Assuming I understand things correctly, which if not at all certain.
--
error compiling committee.c: too many arguments to function
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
