Commit-ID:  bf7b4c472db44413251bcef79ca1f6bf1ec81475
Gitweb:     http://git.kernel.org/tip/bf7b4c472db44413251bcef79ca1f6bf1ec81475
Author:     Waiman Long <waiman.l...@hpe.com>
AuthorDate: Tue, 17 May 2016 21:26:22 -0400
Committer:  Ingo Molnar <mi...@kernel.org>
CommitDate: Wed, 8 Jun 2016 15:17:00 +0200

locking/rwsem: Improve reader wakeup code

In __rwsem_do_wake(), the reader wakeup code will assume a writer
has stolen the lock if the active reader/writer count is not 0.
However, this is not as reliable an indicator as the original
"< RWSEM_WAITING_BIAS" check. If another reader is present, the code
will still break out and exit even if the writer is gone. This patch
changes it to check the same "< RWSEM_WAITING_BIAS" condition to
reduce the chance of false positive.

Signed-off-by: Waiman Long <waiman.l...@hpe.com>
Signed-off-by: Peter Zijlstra (Intel) <pet...@infradead.org>
Reviewed-by: Peter Hurley <pe...@hurleysoftware.com>
Cc: Andrew Morton <a...@linux-foundation.org>
Cc: Dave Chinner <da...@fromorbit.com>
Cc: Davidlohr Bueso <d...@stgolabs.net>
Cc: Douglas Hatch <doug.ha...@hpe.com>
Cc: Jason Low <jason.l...@hp.com>
Cc: Linus Torvalds <torva...@linux-foundation.org>
Cc: Paul E. McKenney <paul...@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
Cc: Peter Zijlstra <pet...@infradead.org>
Cc: Scott J Norton <scott.nor...@hpe.com>
Cc: Thomas Gleixner <t...@linutronix.de>
Link: 
http://lkml.kernel.org/r/1463534783-38814-5-git-send-email-waiman.l...@hpe.com
Signed-off-by: Ingo Molnar <mi...@kernel.org>
---
 kernel/locking/rwsem-xadd.c | 11 ++++++++---
 1 file changed, 8 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)

diff --git a/kernel/locking/rwsem-xadd.c b/kernel/locking/rwsem-xadd.c
index 6b0d060..4f1daf5 100644
--- a/kernel/locking/rwsem-xadd.c
+++ b/kernel/locking/rwsem-xadd.c
@@ -156,9 +156,14 @@ __rwsem_mark_wake(struct rw_semaphore *sem,
                oldcount = atomic_long_add_return(adjustment, &sem->count) - 
adjustment;
 
                if (unlikely(oldcount < RWSEM_WAITING_BIAS)) {
-                       /* A writer stole the lock. Undo our reader grant. */
-                       if (atomic_long_sub_return(adjustment, &sem->count) &
-                                               RWSEM_ACTIVE_MASK)
+                       /*
+                        * If the count is still less than RWSEM_WAITING_BIAS
+                        * after removing the adjustment, it is assumed that
+                        * a writer has stolen the lock. We have to undo our
+                        * reader grant.
+                        */
+                       if (atomic_long_add_return(-adjustment, &sem->count) <
+                           RWSEM_WAITING_BIAS)
                                goto out;
                        /* Last active locker left. Retry waking readers. */
                        goto try_reader_grant;

Reply via email to