Hi Andreas,

Thanks for your reply and review.

On 06/08/2016 05:01 AM, Andreas Dilger wrote:
On Jun 2, 2016, at 6:01 AM, Lin Feng <l...@chinanetcenter.com> wrote:

Descriptions:
ext4 block allocation core stack:
ext4_mb_new_blocks
  ext4_mb_normalize_request
  ext4_mb_regular_allocator
    ext4_mb_find_by_goal
      mb_find_extent(e4b, ac->ac_g_ex.fe_start, ac->ac_g_ex.fe_len, &ex);

The start block searching hint for merging(use EXT4_MB_HINT_TRY_GOAL flag)
set in ext4_mb_normalize_request is stored in ac_f_ex, while in
EXT4_MB_HINT_TRY_GOAL path which falls in ext4_mb_find_by_goal always use
ac_g_ex as a hint and the hint set in ext4_mb_normalize_request is never
use.

We could hit this bug by writing a sparse file from backward mode and the
file may get fragments even if the physical blocks in the hole is free,
which is expected to be merged into a single extent.

This looks reasonable.  Do you have any kind of test case that shows the
effect of the change (e.g. fragmentation counts per file before/after)?

I found this bug by fiddling the block allocation policy for ext4.

In order to see the effect of this patch, we could do the following:

On a fresh created ext4 fs, make a new topdir called b to hash the test to some blockgroup relatively empty, trying to not to be effected by original physical fragments. Then write a new file in backward mode.

steps:
1. mkdir b && cd b

2. before this patch:
[root@CentOS6 b]# rm dat -f && sync && sleep 2 && dd if=/dev/zero of=dat bs=4k count=256 seek=511 conv=notrunc && sync && sleep 2 && dd if=/dev/zero of=dat bs=4k count=254 seek=257 conv=notrunc && sync && filefrag -vv dat
256+0 records in
256+0 records out
1048576 bytes (1.0 MB) copied, 0.000825721 s, 1.3 GB/s
254+0 records in
254+0 records out
1040384 bytes (1.0 MB) copied, 0.000766912 s, 1.4 GB/s
Filesystem type is: ef53
File size of dat is 3141632 (767 blocks, blocksize 4096)
 ext logical physical expected length flags
   0     257     9512             254
   1     511   557056     9766    256 eof
dat: 2 extents found

3. after this patch:
[root@CentOS6 b]# rm dat -f && sync && sleep 2 && dd if=/dev/zero of=dat bs=4k count=256 seek=511 conv=notrunc && sync && sleep 2 && dd if=/dev/zero of=dat bs=4k count=254 seek=257 conv=notrunc && sync && filefrag -vv dat
256+0 records in
256+0 records out
1048576 bytes (1.0 MB) copied, 0.000856416 s, 1.2 GB/s
254+0 records in
254+0 records out
1040384 bytes (1.0 MB) copied, 0.000669862 s, 1.6 GB/s
Filesystem type is: ef53
File size of dat is 3141632 (767 blocks, blocksize 4096)
 ext logical physical expected length flags
   0     257   556802             510 eof
dat: 1 extent found

thanks,
linfeng

Reviewed-by: Andreas Dilger <adil...@dilger.ca>

Signed-off-by: Lin Feng <l...@chinanetcenter.com>
---
fs/ext4/mballoc.c | 8 ++++----
1 file changed, 4 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)

diff --git a/fs/ext4/mballoc.c b/fs/ext4/mballoc.c
index c1ab3ec..e31fc63 100644
--- a/fs/ext4/mballoc.c
+++ b/fs/ext4/mballoc.c
@@ -3198,15 +3198,15 @@ ext4_mb_normalize_request(struct 
ext4_allocation_context *ac,
        if (ar->pright && (ar->lright == (start + size))) {
                /* merge to the right */
                ext4_get_group_no_and_offset(ac->ac_sb, ar->pright - size,
-                                               &ac->ac_f_ex.fe_group,
-                                               &ac->ac_f_ex.fe_start);
+                                               &ac->ac_g_ex.fe_group,
+                                               &ac->ac_g_ex.fe_start);
                ac->ac_flags |= EXT4_MB_HINT_TRY_GOAL;
        }
        if (ar->pleft && (ar->lleft + 1 == start)) {
                /* merge to the left */
                ext4_get_group_no_and_offset(ac->ac_sb, ar->pleft + 1,
-                                               &ac->ac_f_ex.fe_group,
-                                               &ac->ac_f_ex.fe_start);
+                                               &ac->ac_g_ex.fe_group,
+                                               &ac->ac_g_ex.fe_start);
                ac->ac_flags |= EXT4_MB_HINT_TRY_GOAL;
        }

--
1.9.3




Cheers, Andreas






Reply via email to