On Thu, 2 Jun 2016, Dong Aisheng wrote: > On Wed, Apr 27, 2016 at 12:15:00PM +0200, Thomas Gleixner wrote: > > Calling a function which might sleep _BEFORE_ kernel_init() is wrong. Don't > > try to work around such an issue by doing magic irq_disabled() checks and > > busy > > loops. Fix the call site and be done with it. > > > > IRQ chip and clocksource are also initialised before kernel_init() > which may call clk APIs like clk_prepare_enable(). > We may not be able to guarantee those clocks are unsleepable. > > e.g. > For IRQ chip, the arm,gic documents the optional clocks property in > Documentation/devicetree/bindings/interrupt-controller/arm,gic.txt. > Although there seems no user currently, not sure there might be > a exception in the future. > > For clocksource driver, it's quite common to call clk APIs to > enable and get clock rate which may also cause sleep. > e.g. ARM twd clock in arch/arm/kernel/smp_twd.c. > > If we have to avoid the possible sleep caused by these clocks, > we may need to manually check it and change the related clocks > (e.g PLLs) from sleepable to busy loops. > But that is not a good solution and may also not stable when > clock varies. > > It looks like not easy to find a generic solution for them. > What's your suggestion?
I think we should split the prepare callbacks up and move the handling logic into the core. clk_ops.prepare() Legacy callback clk_ops.prepare_hw() Callback which writes to the hardware clk_ops.prepare_done() Callback which checks whether the prepare is completed So now the core can do: clk_prepare() { /* Legacy code should go away */ if (ops->prepare) { ops->prepare(); return; } if (ops->prepare_hw) ops->prepare_hw(); if (!ops->prepare_done()) return; if (early_boot_or_suspend_resume()) { /* * Busy loop when we can't schedule in early boot, * suspend and resume. */ while (!ops->prepare_done()) ; } else { while (!ops->prepare_done()) usleep(clk->prepare_delay); } } As a side effect that allows us to remove the gazillion of while (!hw_ready) usleep(); copies all over the place and we have a single point of control where we allow the clocks to busy loop. Toughts? Thanks, tglx