Hi Nick, Le Mardi 30 Janvier 2007 14:38, Nick Piggin a écrit : > Jean Delvare wrote: > > Yes, this sounds like the right thing to do. So here comes the third > > (and hopefully last) iteration of the patch: > > Thanks Jean, this patch works fine for me.
Great, thanks for testing. > Is this 2.6.20 material? Might it cause more regressions than it fixes? I do believe this is 2.6.20 material. Given that Alan's version doesn't work _at all_, my patch can only help. The real regression is between 2.6.19 and the current Linus tree (with Alan's quirk.) > Andrew, can you pick up this patch in place of the old one you got > (fix-via-irq-quirk-breakage.patch). It was sent to lkml just now. Yes, please. And possibly send it over to Linus while you're there, if everyone's happy with this version. Thanks, -- Jean Delvare Suse L3 - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED] More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
