On Tue, Jan 30, 2007 at 02:18:17AM +0100, Samuel Thibault ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote: > Hi, > > Evgenity, le Mon 29 Jan 2007 16:47:36 +0100, a écrit : > > Userspace M-on-N threading model is based on the idea, that when signal > > is delivered, kernel saves all information related to previous context > > in stack, so it is possible to find it and replace. > > You may want to have a look at some existing implementations:
I saw most of them. As far as I recall, only PTL (is not shown here) has preemptible scheduler. NTL has it too, but is based on different approach. > - Good old `FSU Pthreads' http://moss.csc.ncsu.edu/~mueller/pthreads/ > - fully POSIX-compliant `GnuPth' http://www.gnu.org/software/pth/ > - server-targetted `Capriccio' > www.cs.berkeley.edu/~jcondit/capriccio-sosp-2003.pdf > - efficient `ELiTE/Erlangen' > http://www4.informatik.uni-erlangen.de/Projects/FORTWIHR/ELiTE/ > - and our portable, flexible, efficient `Marcel' > http://runtime.futurs.inria.fr/marcel/ > > Samuel -- Evgeniy Polyakov - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED] More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
