2016-05-25 12:29 GMT+08:00 Jaewon Kim <jaewon31....@samsung.com>:
> From: Jaewon <jaewon31....@samsung.com>
>
> There was an alignment mismatch issue for CMA and it was fixed by
> commit 1cc8e3458b51 ("drivers: of: of_reserved_mem: fixup the alignment with
> CMA setup").
> However the way of the commit considers not only dma-contiguous(CMA) but also
> dma-coherent which has no that requirement.
>
> This patch checks more to distinguish dma-contiguous(CMA) from dma-coherent.
>
> Signed-off-by: Jaewon Kim <jaewon31....@samsung.com>
> ---
> drivers/of/of_reserved_mem.c | 5 ++++-
> 1 file changed, 4 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
>
Acked-by: Jason Liu <r64...@freescale.com>
Jason Liu
> diff --git a/drivers/of/of_reserved_mem.c b/drivers/of/of_reserved_mem.c
> index ed01c01..45b873e 100644
> --- a/drivers/of/of_reserved_mem.c
> +++ b/drivers/of/of_reserved_mem.c
> @@ -127,7 +127,10 @@ static int __init __reserved_mem_alloc_size(unsigned
> long node,
> }
>
> /* Need adjust the alignment to satisfy the CMA requirement */
> - if (IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_CMA) && of_flat_dt_is_compatible(node,
> "shared-dma-pool"))
> + if (IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_CMA)
> + && of_flat_dt_is_compatible(node, "shared-dma-pool")
> + && of_get_flat_dt_prop(node, "reusable", NULL)
> + && !of_get_flat_dt_prop(node, "no-map", NULL)) {
> align = max(align, (phys_addr_t)PAGE_SIZE << max(MAX_ORDER -
> 1, pageblock_order));
>
> prop = of_get_flat_dt_prop(node, "alloc-ranges", &len);
> --
> 1.9.1
>
