On Thu, Mar 10, 2016 at 09:13:13PM -0800, Marc MERLIN wrote:
> On Fri, Mar 11, 2016 at 04:35:21AM +0000, Eric Wheeler wrote:
> > Hello all,
> >
> > We were having a discussion on the bcache list about the safest reboot
> > options via sysrq here:
> > http://thread.gmane.org/gmane.linux.kernel.bcache.devel/3559/focus=3586
> >
> > The result of the discussion ended up in a patch for sysrq-a to call
> > kernel_restart much in the same way as sysrq-ocalls kernel_power_off.
> >
> > Please comment on the patch and suggest any appropriate changes.
>
> Thanks Eric.
>
> The quick rationale is that sysrq-r is not desirable to use if you're using
> bcache, or software raid since it will reboot without giving them a
> chance to properly sync their buffers and get into a clean state.
>
> I've been using sysrq-o to get a clean shutdown, but of course that
> actually powers off the server, and you then need to rely on something
> like WOL to bring the machine back up, which isn't always easy or
> possible.
>
> This new reboot with proper flushing (kernel_power_off) allows for safe
> reboots that don't upset bcache or software raid.
Just updated to 4.6 and re-applied Eric sysrq patch.
It's saved me many times already. I absolutely need to do clean reboots
for both my software raid and bcache, and when the system is not doing
well, sysrq-o does the graceful shutdown, but also powers off my server,
which is not what I want.
I've been using the new sysrq-x Eric wrote and it's been working great.
Any chance, we can get this into standard kernels? I can't be the only
person who benefits from this...
Any suggestion on who might be a good person to
review/critique/integrate this patch?
Thanks,
Marc
--
"A mouse is a device used to point at the xterm you want to type in" - A.S.R.
Microsoft is to operating systems ....
.... what McDonalds is to gourmet cooking
Home page: http://marc.merlins.org/ | PGP 1024R/763BE901
