On Mon, 2007-01-29 at 15:08 +0100, Andrea Gelmini wrote: > On Mon, Jan 22, 2007 at 10:10:39AM +0100, Peter Zijlstra wrote: > > On Fri, 2007-01-12 at 01:39 +0100, Andrea Gelmini wrote: > > > Hi, > > > I can't do the test 'till next week. > > > > > > Thanks a lot for your time, > > > Gelma > > > > Have you ever gotten around to testing this? > > well, I spent some time doing more deeply test. > DB corruption happens anyway, even with the kernel that seems to work > (I say seems because it needs much more effort to get corruption). > I'm trying to understand it. > I will work more over it next week. > > thank a lot for your time,
Sure, no problem. Just a question to clarify matters, which kernels are you testing? That is, you say corruption is now harder to trigger, is that with the .20-rc kernels (or .19.2). Or are we talking about .18 + my patch? - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED] More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
