On Mon, 6 Nov 2000, Oliver Xymoron wrote: > If I understand you correctly: > > process 1 process 2 > open(/dev/dsp) > modprobe-> > load module > init module (can't remember which context, actually) > start writing > set mixer levels > > Is there any reason we ever want to unblock process 1 before process 2 > terminates? No, and I don't think we do. That's not the point. 'init module' is still _after_ 'set mixer levels'. There is a period during which the mixer levels are changed. The desired mixer levels should be available to the module at the time of initialisation. -- dwmw2 - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED] Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
- Re: Persistent module storage [was... Oliver Xymoron
- Re: Persistent module storage [was... Jeff Garzik
- Re: Persistent module storage [was... Oliver Xymoron
- Re: Persistent module storage [was... Horst von Brand
- Re: Persistent module storage [was... Alan Cox
- Re: Persistent module storage [was... Paul Jakma
- Re: Persistent module storage [was... Alan Cox
- Re: Persistent module storage [was... Paul Jakma
- Re: Persistent module storage [was... Keith Owens
- Re: Persistent module storage [was... Oliver Xymoron
- Re: Persistent module storage [was... David Woodhouse
- Re: Persistent module storage [was... Jeff Garzik
- Re: Persistent module storage [was... David Woodhouse
- Re: Persistent module storage [was... Andrew Pimlott
- Re: Persistent module storage [was... Oliver Xymoron
- Re: Persistent module storage [was... David Woodhouse
- Re: Persistent module storage [was... Eric W. Biederman
- Re: Persistent module storage [was... Alan Cox
- Re: Persistent module storage [was... Helge Hafting
- Re: Persistent module storage [was... Keith Owens
- Re: Linux 2.4 Status / TODO page (Updated as of 2.4.0-te... tytso