On Tue, May 24, 2016 at 09:06:03PM -0500, Matthew McClintock wrote: > > > On May 24, 2016, at 8:28 PM, Al Viro <[email protected]> wrote: > > > > The next obvious question is which binary it is and what's the return > > address to userland; make that > > if (!size) > > printk(KERN_ERR "crap in %s[%x]", > > current->comm, > > current_pt_regs()->rip); > > (in the same place) > > This is an ARM board, no rip. Quick log without, can re-run again later > tonight or maybe tomorrow:
probably ->ARM_pc, then... > [ 8.008054] crap in udevd Indeed. Which version of that Fine Piece Of Software is it? Again, the kernel-side bug is real and needs fixing, but "udev does something bogus" is not surprising in the slightest...
