On 05/19/2016 06:20 PM, Rob Herring wrote:
On Thu, May 19, 2016 at 7:28 AM, Nicolas Ferre <nicolas.fe...@atmel.com> wrote:
Le 19/05/2016 01:29, Rob Herring a écrit :
On Wed, May 18, 2016 at 06:02:46PM +0530, Raashid Muhammed wrote:
From: Raashid Muhammed <raashidmuham...@zilogic.com>
sam9-l9260 is a low cost board designed by Olimex.
More infomation is available at:
https://www.olimex.com/Products/ARM/Atmel/SAM9-L9260/
Signed-off-by: Raashid Muhammed <raashidmuham...@zilogic.com>
Reviewed-by: Vijay Kumar B. <vijayku...@bravegnu.org>
---
.../devicetree/bindings/arm/olimex-at91.txt | 6 ++
arch/arm/boot/dts/Makefile | 1 +
arch/arm/boot/dts/sam9-l9260.dts | 108 +++++++++++++++++++++
For AT91-based boards, please use this prefix: "at91-" as stated in the
Atmel README file:
http://lxr.free-electrons.com/source/Documentation/arm/Atmel/README#L127
So I would recommend this name instead:
at91-sam9-l9260.dts
3 files changed, 115 insertions(+)
create mode 100644 Documentation/devicetree/bindings/arm/olimex-at91.txt
create mode 100644 arch/arm/boot/dts/sam9-l9260.dts
diff --git a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/arm/olimex-at91.txt
b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/arm/olimex-at91.txt
new file mode 100644
index 0000000..0587d63
--- /dev/null
+++ b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/arm/olimex-at91.txt
@@ -0,0 +1,6 @@
+Olimex AT91 Device Tree Bindings
+--------------------------------
There's not an existing at91 or olimex file this would fit into? We
don't need 1 file per board.
+
+SAM9-L9260 Board
+Required root node properties:
+ - compatible = "olimex,sam9-l9260", "atmel,at91sam9260";
I don't think this file is needed at all actually. We have a lot of
board files and none of them have a dedicated or particular entry for them.
Well, they should have one.
Rob
Thanks everyone for your valuable comments. I'll incorporate the changes
and resend the patch.
Regards,
Raashid
