On Sat, 2016-05-21 at 21:00 +0200, Mike Galbraith wrote:
> On Sat, 2016-05-21 at 16:04 +0200, Mike Galbraith wrote:
> 
> > Wakees that were not migrated/normalized eat an unwanted min_vruntime,
> > and likely take a size XXL latency hit.  Big box running master bled
> > profusely under heavy load until I turned TTWU_QUEUE off.

May as well make it official and against master.today.  Fly or die
little patchlet.

sched/fair: Move se->vruntime normalization state into struct sched_entity

b5179ac70de ceased globally normalizing wakee vruntime in ttwu(), leaving
sched_ttwu_pending() with the need to know whether each wakee on wake_list
was migrated or not, to pass that on to fair class functions so they can
DTRT wrt vruntime normalization.  Store vruntime normalization state in
struct sched_entity, so fair class functions that need it always have it,
and sched_ttwu_pending() again doesn't need to care whether tasks on the
wake_list have been migrated or not.

Since there are now no consumers of ENQUEUE_MIGRATED, drop it as well. 

master v4.6-8889-gf6c658df6385 virgin
 256     49096  71698.99 MB/sec  warmup   1 sec  latency 1136.488 ms
 256    155009  72862.08 MB/sec  execute   1 sec  latency 3136.900 ms
 256    207430  72628.04 MB/sec  execute   2 sec  latency 4137.001 ms
 256    259635  72442.97 MB/sec  execute   3 sec  latency 5137.105 ms
 256    311905  72371.84 MB/sec  execute   4 sec  latency 6137.214 ms
 256    364210  72564.99 MB/sec  execute   5 sec  latency 7137.323 ms
 256    416551  72598.74 MB/sec  execute   6 sec  latency 5816.895 ms
 256    468824  72601.54 MB/sec  execute   7 sec  latency 6815.386 ms
 256    520996  72621.87 MB/sec  execute   8 sec  latency 7815.499 ms
 256    573113  72608.75 MB/sec  execute   9 sec  latency 8815.609 ms
 256  cleanup  10 sec
   0  cleanup  10 sec

master v4.6-8889-gf6c658df6385 post
 256     51527  75357.55 MB/sec  warmup   1 sec  latency 21.591 ms
 256    157610  73188.06 MB/sec  execute   1 sec  latency 12.985 ms
 256    210089  72809.01 MB/sec  execute   2 sec  latency 11.543 ms
 256    262554  72681.86 MB/sec  execute   3 sec  latency 0.209 ms
 256    315432  72798.65 MB/sec  execute   4 sec  latency 0.206 ms
 256    368162  72963.33 MB/sec  execute   5 sec  latency 8.052 ms
 256    420854  72976.50 MB/sec  execute   6 sec  latency 0.221 ms
 256    473420  72953.76 MB/sec  execute   7 sec  latency 0.198 ms
 256    525859  73011.17 MB/sec  execute   8 sec  latency 2.810 ms
 256    578301  73052.84 MB/sec  execute   9 sec  latency 0.247 ms
 256  cleanup  10 sec
   0  cleanup  10 sec


Fixes: b5179ac70de sched/fair: Prepare to fix fairness problems on migration
Signed-off-by: Mike Galbraith <umgwanakikb...@gmail.com>
---
 include/linux/sched.h |    1 
 kernel/sched/core.c   |    6 +----
 kernel/sched/fair.c   |   60 ++++++++++++++++++++------------------------------
 3 files changed, 28 insertions(+), 39 deletions(-)

--- a/include/linux/sched.h
+++ b/include/linux/sched.h
@@ -1319,6 +1319,7 @@ struct sched_entity {
        struct rb_node          run_node;
        struct list_head        group_node;
        unsigned int            on_rq;
+       bool                    normalized;
 
        u64                     exec_start;
        u64                     sum_exec_runtime;
--- a/kernel/sched/core.c
+++ b/kernel/sched/core.c
@@ -1719,9 +1719,6 @@ ttwu_do_activate(struct rq *rq, struct t
 #ifdef CONFIG_SMP
        if (p->sched_contributes_to_load)
                rq->nr_uninterruptible--;
-
-       if (wake_flags & WF_MIGRATED)
-               en_flags |= ENQUEUE_MIGRATED;
 #endif
 
        ttwu_activate(rq, p, en_flags);
@@ -1774,7 +1771,7 @@ void sched_ttwu_pending(void)
                 * See ttwu_queue(); we only call ttwu_queue_remote() when
                 * its a x-cpu wakeup.
                 */
-               ttwu_do_activate(rq, p, WF_MIGRATED, cookie);
+               ttwu_do_activate(rq, p, 0, cookie);
        }
 
        lockdep_unpin_lock(&rq->lock, cookie);
@@ -2166,6 +2163,7 @@ static void __sched_fork(unsigned long c
        p->se.prev_sum_exec_runtime     = 0;
        p->se.nr_migrations             = 0;
        p->se.vruntime                  = 0;
+       p->se.normalized                = true;
        INIT_LIST_HEAD(&p->se.group_node);
 
 #ifdef CONFIG_FAIR_GROUP_SCHED
--- a/kernel/sched/fair.c
+++ b/kernel/sched/fair.c
@@ -3230,6 +3230,7 @@ place_entity(struct cfs_rq *cfs_rq, stru
 
        /* ensure we never gain time by being placed backwards. */
        se->vruntime = max_vruntime(se->vruntime, vruntime);
+       se->normalized = false;
 }
 
 static void check_enqueue_throttle(struct cfs_rq *cfs_rq);
@@ -3285,29 +3286,40 @@ static inline void check_schedstat_requi
  * CPU and an up-to-date min_vruntime on the destination CPU.
  */
 
+static void normalize_entity(struct cfs_rq *cfs_rq, struct sched_entity *se)
+{
+       se->vruntime -= cfs_rq->min_vruntime;
+       se->normalized = true;
+}
+
+static void renormalize_entity(struct cfs_rq *cfs_rq, struct sched_entity *se)
+{
+       se->vruntime += cfs_rq->min_vruntime;
+       se->normalized = false;
+}
+
 static void
 enqueue_entity(struct cfs_rq *cfs_rq, struct sched_entity *se, int flags)
 {
-       bool renorm = !(flags & ENQUEUE_WAKEUP) || (flags & ENQUEUE_MIGRATED);
-       bool curr = cfs_rq->curr == se;
+       bool renorm = se->normalized, curr = cfs_rq->curr == se;
 
        /*
-        * If we're the current task, we must renormalise before calling
+        * If we're the current task, we must renormalize before calling
         * update_curr().
         */
        if (renorm && curr)
-               se->vruntime += cfs_rq->min_vruntime;
+               renormalize_entity(cfs_rq, se);
 
        update_curr(cfs_rq);
 
        /*
-        * Otherwise, renormalise after, such that we're placed at the current
+        * Otherwise, renormalize after, such that we're placed at the current
         * moment in time, instead of some random moment in the past. Being
         * placed in the past could significantly boost this task to the
         * fairness detriment of existing tasks.
         */
        if (renorm && !curr)
-               se->vruntime += cfs_rq->min_vruntime;
+               renormalize_entity(cfs_rq, se);
 
        enqueue_entity_load_avg(cfs_rq, se);
        account_entity_enqueue(cfs_rq, se);
@@ -3406,7 +3418,7 @@ dequeue_entity(struct cfs_rq *cfs_rq, st
         * movement in our normalized position.
         */
        if (!(flags & DEQUEUE_SLEEP))
-               se->vruntime -= cfs_rq->min_vruntime;
+               normalize_entity(cfs_rq, se);
 
        /* return excess runtime on last dequeue */
        return_cfs_rq_runtime(cfs_rq);
@@ -5408,7 +5420,7 @@ static void migrate_task_rq_fair(struct
                min_vruntime = cfs_rq->min_vruntime;
 #endif
 
-               se->vruntime -= min_vruntime;
+               normalize_entity(cfs_rq, se);
        }
 
        /*
@@ -8319,7 +8331,7 @@ static void task_fork_fair(struct task_s
                resched_curr(rq);
        }
 
-       se->vruntime -= cfs_rq->min_vruntime;
+       normalize_entity(cfs_rq, se);
 
        raw_spin_unlock_irqrestore(&rq->lock, flags);
 }
@@ -8348,29 +8360,7 @@ prio_changed_fair(struct rq *rq, struct
 
 static inline bool vruntime_normalized(struct task_struct *p)
 {
-       struct sched_entity *se = &p->se;
-
-       /*
-        * In both the TASK_ON_RQ_QUEUED and TASK_ON_RQ_MIGRATING cases,
-        * the dequeue_entity(.flags=0) will already have normalized the
-        * vruntime.
-        */
-       if (p->on_rq)
-               return true;
-
-       /*
-        * When !on_rq, vruntime of the task has usually NOT been normalized.
-        * But there are some cases where it has already been normalized:
-        *
-        * - A forked child which is waiting for being woken up by
-        *   wake_up_new_task().
-        * - A task which has been woken up by try_to_wake_up() and
-        *   waiting for actually being woken up by sched_ttwu_pending().
-        */
-       if (!se->sum_exec_runtime || p->state == TASK_WAKING)
-               return true;
-
-       return false;
+       return p->se.normalized;
 }
 
 static void detach_task_cfs_rq(struct task_struct *p)
@@ -8384,7 +8374,7 @@ static void detach_task_cfs_rq(struct ta
                 * cause 'unlimited' sleep bonus.
                 */
                place_entity(cfs_rq, se, 0);
-               se->vruntime -= cfs_rq->min_vruntime;
+               normalize_entity(cfs_rq, se);
        }
 
        /* Catch up with the cfs_rq and remove our load when we leave */
@@ -8407,8 +8397,8 @@ static void attach_task_cfs_rq(struct ta
        /* Synchronize task with its cfs_rq */
        attach_entity_load_avg(cfs_rq, se);
 
-       if (!vruntime_normalized(p))
-               se->vruntime += cfs_rq->min_vruntime;
+       if (vruntime_normalized(p))
+               renormalize_entity(cfs_rq, se);
 }
 
 static void switched_from_fair(struct rq *rq, struct task_struct *p)

Reply via email to