On 19/05/2016 16:52, Christian Borntraeger wrote: >> > Would this work too and be simpler? > Hmm, your patch does only fiddle with the grow/shrink logic (which might > be a good idea independently of this change), but the original patch > actually takes into account that we have a guaranteed maximum time by a > wakeup timer - IOW we know exactly what the maximum poll time is. >
Yes, it's different. The question is whether a 10us poll (40,000 clock cycles) has an impact even if it's sometimes wrong. Thanks, Paolo
