On Tue, 2016-05-17 at 13:09 +0200, Peter Zijlstra wrote:
> On Mon, May 16, 2016 at 06:12:25PM -0700, Linus Torvalds wrote:
> > On Mon, May 16, 2016 at 5:37 PM, Jason Low <jason.l...@hpe.com> wrote:
> > >
> > > This rest of the series converts the rwsem count variable to an
> > > atomic_long_t
> > > since it is used it as an atomic variable. This allows us to also remove
> > > the rwsem_atomic_{add,update} abstraction and reduce 100+ lines of code.
> >
> > I would suggest you merge all the "remove rwsem_atomic_{add,update}"
> > patches into a single patch.
> >
> > I don't see the advantage to splitting those up by architecture, and
> > it does add noise to the series.
> >
> > Other than that it all looks fine to me.
>
> OK, done.
Right, they all fit under the same category of "Removing
rwsem_atomic_{add,update}", so it makes sense to fold them into one
patch.
Thanks,
Jason
