On 12-05-16, 15:13, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote: > From: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wyso...@intel.com> > > None of the cpufreq governors currently in the tree will ever fail > an invocation of the ->governor() callback with the event argument > equal to CPUFREQ_GOV_POLICY_EXIT (unless invoked with incorrect > arguments which doesn't matter anyway) and it wouldn't really > make sense to fail it, because the caller won't be able to handle > that failure in a meaningful way. > > Accordingly, rearrange the code in the core to make it clear that > this call never fails. > > Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wyso...@intel.com> > --- > drivers/cpufreq/cpufreq.c | 35 ++++++++++++----------------------- > 1 file changed, 12 insertions(+), 23 deletions(-)
Acked-by: Viresh Kumar <viresh.ku...@linaro.org> -- viresh
