On Tue, 2016-05-10 at 12:25 -0700, Christoph Hellwig wrote: > Hi Vishal, > > can you also pick up the my patch to add a low-level __dax_zero_range > that I cced you on? That way we can avoid a nasty merge conflict with > my xfs/iomap changes.
Good idea - I'll do that for the next posting. I'll wait a day or two for any additional reviews/acks. I'm looking to get all this into a branch in the nvdimm tree once Jan splits up his dax-locking series.. Mostly I guess I'm looking for a yay or nay for the block layer changes (patch 2). Jens?
