Em Fri, May 06, 2016 at 08:59:07AM +0000, He Kuang escreveu:
> There's no need for dwarf support when perf recording with callchain.

Can you rewrite this? We do need to have support for dwarf when
processing "dwarf style" callchains.

- Arnaldo
 
> Signed-off-by: He Kuang <heku...@huawei.com>
> ---
>  tools/perf/util/util.c | 2 --
>  1 file changed, 2 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/tools/perf/util/util.c b/tools/perf/util/util.c
> index b7766c5..e5ebfd4 100644
> --- a/tools/perf/util/util.c
> +++ b/tools/perf/util/util.c
> @@ -471,7 +471,6 @@ int parse_callchain_record(const char *arg, struct 
> callchain_param *param)
>                                      "needed for --call-graph fp\n");
>                       break;
>  
> -#ifdef HAVE_DWARF_UNWIND_SUPPORT
>               /* Dwarf style */
>               } else if (!strncmp(name, "dwarf", sizeof("dwarf"))) {
>                       const unsigned long default_stack_dump_size = 8192;
> @@ -487,7 +486,6 @@ int parse_callchain_record(const char *arg, struct 
> callchain_param *param)
>                               ret = get_stack_size(tok, &size);
>                               param->dump_size = size;
>                       }
> -#endif /* HAVE_DWARF_UNWIND_SUPPORT */
>               } else if (!strncmp(name, "lbr", sizeof("lbr"))) {
>                       if (!strtok_r(NULL, ",", &saveptr)) {
>                               param->record_mode = CALLCHAIN_LBR;
> -- 
> 1.8.5.2

Reply via email to