On 05-05-16, 10:20, Sudeep Holla wrote: > On Thu, May 5, 2016 at 10:14 AM, Eric Engestrom > <eric.engest...@imgtec.com> wrote: > > From: Rufus Hamade <rufus.ham...@imgtec.com> > > > > A few `#ifdef CONFIG_OF` were missing, resulting in "unused function" > > warnings in core.c. > > > > Signed-off-by: Rufus Hamade <rufus.ham...@imgtec.com> > > Reviewed-by: Eric Engestrom <eric.engest...@imgtec.com> > > Tested-by: Eric Engestrom <eric.engest...@imgtec.com> > > --- > > v2: drop incorrect change in cpu.c (Viresh Kumar) > > > > On Thu, May 05, 2016 at 08:31:09AM +0530, Viresh Kumar wrote: > >> Some things have already changed, can you please rebase on linux-next > >> and resend this patch? > > > > I rebased on top of linux-next (30d0993ec9f6) from the repo > > git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/rafael/linux-pm > > but there were no change (the patch is identical, save for the > > removed change in cpu.c; not even a line number changed). > > Which repo did you want me to rebase on? > > > > I posted some changes around this a week ago, I see Rafael has pulled into > his bleeding-edge[1] patch this morning. If no issue are found, it > should eventually > make to linux-next in couple of days.
I have tried to fix all these issues differently, most of you are cc'd on that patch: [PATCH] PM / OPP: Move CONFIG_OF dependent code in a separate file -- viresh
