From: Wanpeng Li <wanpeng...@hotmail.com>

'commit 9642d18eee2c ("nohz: Affine unpinned timers to housekeepers")'
intended to affine unpinned timers to housekeepers:

unpinned timers(full dynaticks, idle)   =>   nearest busy 
housekeepers(otherwise, fallback to any housekeepers)
unpinned timers(full dynaticks, busy)   =>   nearest busy 
housekeepers(otherwise, fallback to any housekeepers)
unpinned timers(houserkeepers, idle)    =>   nearest busy 
housekeepers(otherwise, fallback to itself)

However, the !idle_cpu(i) && is_housekeeping_cpu(cpu) check modify the 
intention to:

unpinned timers(full dynaticks, idle)   =>   any housekeepers(no mattter cpu 
topology)
unpinned timers(full dynaticks, busy)   =>   any housekeepers(no mattter cpu 
topology)
unpinned timers(housekeepers, idle)     =>   any busy cpus(otherwise, fallback 
to any housekeepers)

This patch fix it by checking if there is busy housekeepers nearby,
otherwise fallback to any housekeepers/itself, after the patch:

unpinned timers(full dynaticks, idle)   =>   nearest busy 
housekeepers(otherwise, fallback to any housekeepers)
unpinned timers(full dynaticks, busy)   =>   nearest busy 
housekeepers(otherwise, fallback to any housekeepers)
unpinned timers(housekeepers, idle)     =>   nearest busy 
housekeepers(otherwise, fallback to itself)

Fixes: 'commit 9642d18eee2c ("nohz: Affine unpinned timers to housekeepers")' 
Cc: Frederic Weisbecker <fweis...@gmail.com>
Cc: Peter Zijlstra <pet...@infradead.org>
Cc: Thomas Gleixner <t...@linutronix.de> 
Cc: Ingo Molnar <mi...@kernel.org>
Signed-off-by: Wanpeng Li <wanpeng...@hotmail.com>
---
 kernel/sched/core.c |    5 ++++-
 1 files changed, 4 insertions(+), 1 deletions(-)

diff --git a/kernel/sched/core.c b/kernel/sched/core.c
index adcafda..5538761 100644
--- a/kernel/sched/core.c
+++ b/kernel/sched/core.c
@@ -499,7 +499,10 @@ int get_nohz_timer_target(void)
        rcu_read_lock();
        for_each_domain(cpu, sd) {
                for_each_cpu(i, sched_domain_span(sd)) {
-                       if (!idle_cpu(i) && is_housekeeping_cpu(cpu)) {
+                       if (cpu == i)
+                               continue;
+
+                       if (!idle_cpu(i) && is_housekeeping_cpu(i)) {
                                cpu = i;
                                goto unlock;
                        }
-- 
1.7.1

Reply via email to