I am sure I missed the problem, but... On 05/02, Kirill A. Shutemov wrote: > > Quick look around: > > - I don't see any check page_count() around __replace_page() in uprobes, > so it can easily replace pinned page.
Why it should? even if it races with get_user_pages_fast()... this doesn't differ from the case when an application writes to MAP_PRIVATE non-anonymous region, no? Oleg.
