On 04/21, Stephen Boyd wrote: > Now that we have a clk registration API that doesn't return > struct clks, we need to have some way to hand out struct clks via > the clk_get() APIs that doesn't involve associating struct clk > pointers with an OF node. Currently we ask the OF provider to > give us a struct clk pointer for some clkspec, turn that struct > clk into a struct clk_hw and then allocate a new struct clk to > return to the caller. > > Let's add a clk_hw based OF provider hook that returns a struct > clk_hw directly, so that we skip the intermediate step of > converting from struct clk to struct clk_hw. Eventually when > we've converted all OF clk providers to struct clk_hw based APIs > we can remove the struct clk based ones. > > It should also be noted that we change the onecell provider to > have a flex array instead of a pointer for the array of clk_hw > pointers. This allows providers to allocate one structure of the > correct length in one step instead of two. > > Signed-off-by: Stephen Boyd <sb...@codeaurora.org> > ---
Applied to clk-next -- Qualcomm Innovation Center, Inc. is a member of Code Aurora Forum, a Linux Foundation Collaborative Project
