On Fri, Jan 19, 2007 at 06:05:44PM -0700, dann frazier wrote: (...) > Ah, think I see the problem now: > > --- kernel-source-2.4.27.orig/fs/smbfs/proc.c 2007-01-19 17:53:57.247695476 > -0700 > +++ kernel-source-2.4.27/fs/smbfs/proc.c 2007-01-19 17:49:07.480161733 > -0700 > @@ -1997,7 +1997,7 @@ > fattr->f_mode = (server->mnt->dir_mode & (S_IRWXU | S_IRWXG | > S_IRWXO)) | S_IFDIR; > else if ( (server->mnt->flags & SMB_MOUNT_FMODE) && > !(S_ISDIR(fattr->f_mode)) ) > - fattr->f_mode = (server->mnt->file_mode & (S_IRWXU | S_IRWXG | > S_IRWXO)) | S_IFREG; > + fattr->f_mode = (server->mnt->file_mode & (S_IRWXU | S_IRWXG | > S_IRWXO)) | (fattr->f_mode & S_IFMT); > > } > > Santiago: Thanks for reporting this - can you test this patch out on > your system and let me know if there are still any problems? > > Willy: I'll do some more testing and get you a patch that fixes this > and the double assignment nonsense. Would you prefer a single patch or > two?
Since the double assignment is not a bug per se, don't bother making a separate patch, put everything in the same one. Thanks a lot for your very fast response ! Cheers, Willy - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED] More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
