On Thu, 2016-04-21 at 09:30 +0530, Madhavan Srinivasan wrote:
> @@ -488,17 +489,17 @@ static int power8_compute_mmcr(u64 event[], int n_ev,
>
> /* Table of alternatives, sorted by column 0 */
> static const unsigned int event_alternatives[][MAX_ALT] = {
> - { 0x10134, 0x301e2 }, /* PM_MRK_ST_CMPL */
> - { 0x10138, 0x40138 }, /* PM_BR_MRK_2PATH */
> - { 0x18082, 0x3e05e }, /* PM_L3_CO_MEPF */
> - { 0x1d14e, 0x401e8 }, /* PM_MRK_DATA_FROM_L2MISS */
> - { 0x1e054, 0x4000a }, /* PM_CMPLU_STALL */
> - { 0x20036, 0x40036 }, /* PM_BR_2PATH */
> - { 0x200f2, 0x300f2 }, /* PM_INST_DISP */
> - { 0x200f4, 0x600f4 }, /* PM_RUN_CYC */
> - { 0x2013c, 0x3012e }, /* PM_MRK_FILT_MATCH */
> - { 0x3e054, 0x400f0 }, /* PM_LD_MISS_L1 */
> - { 0x400fa, 0x500fa }, /* PM_RUN_INST_CMPL */
> + { PM_MRK_ST_CMPL, _PM_MRK_ST_CMPL },
> + { PM_BR_MRK_2PATH, _PM_BR_MRK_2PATH },
> + { PM_L3_CO_MEPF, _PM_L3_CO_MEPF },
> + { PM_MRK_DATA_FROM_L2MISS, _PM_MRK_DATA_FROM_L2MISS },
> + { PM_CMPLU_STALL, _PM_CMPLU_STALL },
> + { PM_BR_2PATH, _PM_BR_2PATH },
> + { PM_INST_DISP, _PM_INST_DISP },
> + { _PM_RUN_CYC, PM_RUN_CYC },
> + { PM_MRK_FILT_MATCH, _PM_MRK_FILT_MATCH },
> + { PM_LD_MISS_L1, _PM_LD_MISS_L1 },
> + { _PM_RUN_INST_CMPL, PM_RUN_INST_CMPL },
I think I'd prefer it if the alternate events were named more like
PM_MRK_ST_CMPL_ALT, or ALT_PM_MRK_ST_CMPL ?
cheers
