On Wed, 2016-04-20 at 15:55 +0300, Jarkko Nikula wrote:
> On 04/14/2016 03:53 PM, Jisheng Zhang wrote:
> >
> > If i2c_dw_probe() fail, we should call i2c_dw_plat_prepare_clk() to
> > disable and unprepare the clk, otherwise the clk enable and prepare
> > is left unbalanced.
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Jisheng Zhang <jszh...@marvell.com>
> > ---
> > drivers/i2c/busses/i2c-designware-platdrv.c | 2 ++
> > 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+)
> >
> > diff --git a/drivers/i2c/busses/i2c-designware-platdrv.c
> > b/drivers/i2c/busses/i2c-designware-platdrv.c
> > index 00f9e99..1488cea 100644
> > --- a/drivers/i2c/busses/i2c-designware-platdrv.c
> > +++ b/drivers/i2c/busses/i2c-designware-platdrv.c
> > @@ -268,6 +268,8 @@ rpm_disable:
> > pm_runtime_put_noidle(&pdev->dev);
> > }
> >
> > + i2c_dw_plat_prepare_clk(dev, false);
> > +
> > return r;
> > }
> >
> This is a bit unclear to me does devm_clk_get take care of clk
> disabling
> in case of probe error or driver removal?
>
> I see Andy's 1cb715ca4694 ("i2c-designware: move to managed functions
> (devm_*)") removed it but at quick look drivers/clk/clk-devres.c:
> devm_clk_release() calls only clk_put and I don't see disable is done
> down the path.
The following is a mistake of the mentioned patch.
- clk_disable_unprepare(dev->clk);
I did at the same mistake in dw_dmac driver which had been fixed later
in the commit 8be4f523b480 ("dmaengine: dw: fix regression in dw_probe()
function").
--
Andy Shevchenko <andriy.shevche...@linux.intel.com>
Intel Finland Oy
