Em Wed, Apr 20, 2016 at 02:55:58PM +1000, Michael Ellerman escreveu: > On Wed, 2016-04-20 at 00:57 -0300, Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo wrote: > > Em Mon, Apr 18, 2016 at 03:17:11PM +0530, Anju T escreveu: > > > On Saturday 20 February 2016 10:32 AM, Anju T wrote: > > > > tools/perf/arch/powerpc/include/perf_regs.h | 69 ++++++++++++++++++++++ > > > > tools/perf/arch/powerpc/util/Build | 1 + > > > > tools/perf/arch/powerpc/util/perf_regs.c | 49 ++++++++++++++++ > > > > tools/perf/config/Makefile | 5 ++ > > > > create mode 100644 tools/perf/arch/powerpc/include/perf_regs.h > > > > create mode 100644 tools/perf/arch/powerpc/util/perf_regs.c
> > > Can this be taken into the next tree? > > Even the bits in tools/perf/ are arch specific, so I guess this goes via > > the powerpc tree? Michael? > Yeah if that's OK with you. > > It doesn't look like it will generate much in the way of merge conflicts. > > Do you want to send an ack? For the tools/perf/ bits: Acked-by: Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <a...@redhat.com> - Arnaldo
