Hi Lars, > -----Original Message----- > From: Lars-Peter Clausen [mailto:l...@metafoo.de] > Sent: Wednesday, April 20, 2016 4:45 PM > To: Appana Durga Kedareswara Rao <appa...@xilinx.com>; Shubhrajyoti Datta > <shubhrajyoti.da...@gmail.com> > Cc: Rob Herring <robh...@kernel.org>; Pawel Moll <pawel.m...@arm.com>; > Mark Rutland <mark.rutl...@arm.com>; Ian Campbell > <ijc+devicet...@hellion.org.uk>; Kumar Gala <ga...@codeaurora.org>; Michal > Simek <mich...@xilinx.com>; Soren Brinkmann <sor...@xilinx.com>; > vinod.k...@intel.com; dan.j.willi...@intel.com; Moritz Fischer > <moritz.fisc...@ettus.com>; Laurent Pinchart > <laurent.pinch...@ideasonboard.com>; l...@debethencourt.com; Anirudha > Sarangi <anir...@xilinx.com>; Punnaiah Choudary Kalluri > <punn...@xilinx.com>; dmaeng...@vger.kernel.org; > devicet...@vger.kernel.org; linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org; linux-arm- > ker...@lists.infradead.org > Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/2] Documentation: DT: vdma: Add clock support for vdma > > On 04/20/2016 10:39 AM, Appana Durga Kedareswara Rao wrote: > [...] > >> however we should keep the names same as the TRM. > > > > Why?? Why can't we use simple convenient names that refers to > > equivalent clocks of h/w > > Because it is confusing. If you use the same name it's very straight forward > to > understand which clock is being referred to. That's not the case if you come > up > with random new names.
Ok will fix in the v2... Regards, Kedar.
