Hello Minchan, On (04/19/16 17:00), Minchan Kim wrote: > Great! > > So, based on your experiment, the reason I couldn't see such huge win > in my mahcine is cache size difference(i.e., yours is twice than mine, > IIRC.) and my perf stat didn't show such big difference. > If I have a time, I will test it in bigger machine.
quite possible it's due to the cache size. [..] > > NOTE: > > -- fio seems does not attempt to write to device more than disk size, so > > the test don't include 're-compresion path'. > > I'm convinced now with your data. Super thanks! > However, as you know, we need data how bad it is in heavy memory pressure. > Maybe, you can test it with fio and backgound memory hogger, yeah, sure, will work on it. > Thanks for the test, Sergey! thanks! -ss