* Kees Cook <keesc...@chromium.org> wrote:
> On Thu, Apr 14, 2016 at 9:08 PM, Baoquan He <b...@redhat.com> wrote:
> >> I will split these chunks up into the correct patches and resend the
> >> series.
> >> If you get a chance, can you double-check this?
> >
> > Yes, these changes sounds great. I checked the series you posted, and have
> > to
> > say you make them look much better. The change logs are perfect and great
> > code
> > refactoring. Just one little bit thing, here:
> >
> > [kees: rewrote changelog, refactored goto into while, limit 32-bit to 1G]
> > in
> > patch [PATCH v5 19/21] x86, KASLR: Add physical address randomization >4G
> >
> > In i386 KERNEL_IMAGE_SIZE is kept to be 0x20000000, namely 512M, w/o kaslr
> > enabled. So here I guess it's a typo, should be "limit 32-bit to 1G". And
> > what
> > I said is wrong about upper limit yesterday, in fact i386 can put kernel in
> > [16M, 896M), not 768M. But KERNEL_IMAGE_SIZE is good enough for i386 for
> > now.
>
> Ah yeah, thanks. If we do a v6, I'll update the typo. I was going to say
> "limit
> 32-bit to KERNEL_IMAGE_SIZE" but it was going to line-wrap.
> :P
No need to resend, I've fixed the changelog.
Thanks,
Ingo
