On Wed, 17 Jan 2007, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > On Wed, 17 Jan 2007 17:04:20 EST, "Robert P. J. Day" said: > > > > How much of the 'OBSOLETE' code should just be labelled 'BROKEN' > > > instead? > > > > the stuff that's actually "broken." :-) > > Right - the question is how much code qualifies as either/both, and > which we should use when we encounter the random driver that's both > obsolete *and* broken...
that's entirely a judgment call on the part of the code's maintainer. if something is both obsolete and broken, then make it depend on *both* OBSOLETE and BROKEN if you want. no big deal. rday - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED] More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
