Hello, Christoph. On Fri, Mar 04, 2016 at 09:39:47AM -0800, Christoph Hellwig wrote: > On Sat, Mar 05, 2016 at 12:29:39AM +0700, Linus Walleij wrote: > > I'm doing a summary of this discussion as a part of presenting > > Linaro's involvement in Paolo's work. So I try to understand things. > > Btw, can someone explain why you guys waste so much time hacking and > arguing about a legacy codebase (old request code and I/O schedulers) > that everyone would really like to see disappear. Why don't you > spend your time on blk-mq where you have an entirely clean slate > for scheduling?
idk, are we gonna duplicate a full disk scheduler on blk-mq path? I think it'd be more sensible to make blk-mq call into the old elevator path for scheduling IOs on rotating rusts. Thanks. -- tejun
