On Sat, 09 Apr, at 01:30:34PM, Chris Mason wrote: > > [ nohz throttling patch ] > > I tested the nohz throttle two different ways, first with schbench's > pipe simulation, it's easily 8% faster with messages bouncing between > cpus. > > In production it's hard to pick a single number because the benchmarks > produce latency curves as the workload scales up in RPS. The benefits > range from 2-9% depending on the metric. It's a nice win, and I'd love to > see it go in.
Do we have any idea what the tradeoff is against power consumption for throttling nohz?
