Hi Stephen, Mike, On Wed, Mar 23, 2016 at 05:38:24PM +0100, Maxime Ripard wrote: > The composite clock didn't have any unregistration function, which forced > us to use clk_unregister directly on it. > > While it was already not great from an API point of view, it also meant > that we were leaking the clk_composite structure allocated in > clk_register_composite. > > Add a clk_unregister_composite function to fix this. > > Signed-off-by: Maxime Ripard <[email protected]>
Any comment on this one ? (and the other clock patches) Thanks, Maxime -- Maxime Ripard, Free Electrons Embedded Linux, Kernel and Android engineering http://free-electrons.com
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
