On Thu, 17 Mar 2016 14:19:15 +0000
Jon Hunter <jonath...@nvidia.com> wrote:

> If the GIC initialisation fails, then currently we do not return an error
> or clean-up afterwards. Although for root controllers, this failure may be
> fatal anyway, for secondary controllers, it may not be fatal and so return
> an error on failure and clean-up.
> 
> For non-banked GIC controllers, make sure that we free any memory
> allocated if we fail to initialise the IRQ domain. Please note that
> free_percpu() only frees memory if the pointer passed to it is not NULL
> and so it is unnecessary to check if both pointers are valid or not.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Jon Hunter <jonath...@nvidia.com>
> ---
>  drivers/irqchip/irq-gic.c | 57 
> ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++-------------
>  1 file changed, 41 insertions(+), 16 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/drivers/irqchip/irq-gic.c b/drivers/irqchip/irq-gic.c
> index b0a781f8c450..42a1412b5186 100644
> --- a/drivers/irqchip/irq-gic.c
> +++ b/drivers/irqchip/irq-gic.c
> @@ -999,13 +999,13 @@ static const struct irq_domain_ops gic_irq_domain_ops = 
> {
>       .unmap = gic_irq_domain_unmap,
>  };
>  
> -static void __init __gic_init_bases(unsigned int gic_nr, int irq_start,
> +static int __init __gic_init_bases(unsigned int gic_nr, int irq_start,
>                          void __iomem *dist_base, void __iomem *cpu_base,
>                          u32 percpu_offset, struct fwnode_handle *handle)
>  {
>       irq_hw_number_t hwirq_base;
>       struct gic_chip_data *gic;
> -     int gic_irqs, irq_base, i;
> +     int gic_irqs, irq_base, i, ret;
>  
>       BUG_ON(gic_nr >= CONFIG_ARM_GIC_MAX_NR);
>  
> @@ -1030,17 +1030,16 @@ static void __init __gic_init_bases(unsigned int 
> gic_nr, int irq_start,
>               gic->chip.irq_set_affinity = gic_set_affinity;
>  #endif
>  
> -#ifdef CONFIG_GIC_NON_BANKED
> -     if (percpu_offset) { /* Frankein-GIC without banked registers... */
> +     if (IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_GIC_NON_BANKED) && percpu_offset) {
> +             /* Frankein-GIC without banked registers... */
>               unsigned int cpu;
>  
>               gic->dist_base.percpu_base = alloc_percpu(void __iomem *);
>               gic->cpu_base.percpu_base = alloc_percpu(void __iomem *);
>               if (WARN_ON(!gic->dist_base.percpu_base ||
>                           !gic->cpu_base.percpu_base)) {
> -                     free_percpu(gic->dist_base.percpu_base);
> -                     free_percpu(gic->cpu_base.percpu_base);
> -                     return;
> +                     ret = -ENOMEM;
> +                     goto error;
>               }
>  
>               for_each_possible_cpu(cpu) {
> @@ -1052,9 +1051,8 @@ static void __init __gic_init_bases(unsigned int 
> gic_nr, int irq_start,
>               }
>  
>               gic_set_base_accessor(gic, gic_get_percpu_base);
> -     } else
> -#endif
> -     {                       /* Normal, sane GIC... */
> +     } else {
> +             /* Normal, sane GIC... */
>               WARN(percpu_offset,
>                    "GIC_NON_BANKED not enabled, ignoring %08x offset!",
>                    percpu_offset);
> @@ -1104,8 +1102,10 @@ static void __init __gic_init_bases(unsigned int 
> gic_nr, int irq_start,
>                                       hwirq_base, &gic_irq_domain_ops, gic);
>       }
>  
> -     if (WARN_ON(!gic->domain))
> -             return;
> +     if (WARN_ON(!gic->domain)) {
> +             ret = -ENODEV;
> +             goto error;
> +     }
>  
>       if (gic_nr == 0) {
>               /*
> @@ -1127,6 +1127,18 @@ static void __init __gic_init_bases(unsigned int 
> gic_nr, int irq_start,
>       gic_dist_init(gic);
>       gic_cpu_init(gic);
>       gic_pm_init(gic);
> +
> +     return 0;
> +
> +error:
> +     if (IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_GIC_NON_BANKED) && percpu_offset) {
> +             free_percpu(gic->dist_base.percpu_base);
> +             free_percpu(gic->cpu_base.percpu_base);
> +     }
> +
> +     kfree(gic->chip.name);

Ah, this is where Linus' remark about "GICv2" clashes. Either you keep
the allocation in the previous patch, or you guard this with a test on
the EOImode. I'll leave it up to you.

> +
> +     return ret;
>  }
>  
>  void __init gic_init(unsigned int gic_nr, int irq_start,
> @@ -1187,7 +1199,7 @@ gic_of_init(struct device_node *node, struct 
> device_node *parent)
>       void __iomem *cpu_base;
>       void __iomem *dist_base;
>       u32 percpu_offset;
> -     int irq;
> +     int irq, ret;
>  
>       if (WARN_ON(!node))
>               return -ENODEV;
> @@ -1212,8 +1224,14 @@ gic_of_init(struct device_node *node, struct 
> device_node *parent)
>       if (of_property_read_u32(node, "cpu-offset", &percpu_offset))
>               percpu_offset = 0;
>  
> -     __gic_init_bases(gic_cnt, -1, dist_base, cpu_base, percpu_offset,
> +     ret = __gic_init_bases(gic_cnt, -1, dist_base, cpu_base, percpu_offset,
>                        &node->fwnode);
> +     if (ret) {
> +             iounmap(dist_base);
> +             iounmap(cpu_base);
> +             return ret;
> +     }
> +
>       if (!gic_cnt)
>               gic_init_physaddr(node);
>  
> @@ -1302,7 +1320,7 @@ static int __init gic_v2_acpi_init(struct 
> acpi_subtable_header *header,
>       struct acpi_madt_generic_distributor *dist;
>       void __iomem *cpu_base, *dist_base;
>       struct fwnode_handle *domain_handle;
> -     int count;
> +     int count, ret;
>  
>       /* Collect CPU base addresses */
>       count = acpi_table_parse_madt(ACPI_MADT_TYPE_GENERIC_INTERRUPT,
> @@ -1345,7 +1363,14 @@ static int __init gic_v2_acpi_init(struct 
> acpi_subtable_header *header,
>               return -ENOMEM;
>       }
>  
> -     __gic_init_bases(0, -1, dist_base, cpu_base, 0, domain_handle);
> +     ret = __gic_init_bases(0, -1, dist_base, cpu_base, 0, domain_handle);
> +     if (ret) {
> +             pr_err("Failed to initialise GIC\n");
> +             irq_domain_free_fwnode(domain_handle);
> +             iounmap(cpu_base);
> +             iounmap(dist_base);
> +             return ret;
> +     }
>  
>       acpi_set_irq_model(ACPI_IRQ_MODEL_GIC, domain_handle);
>  

Otherwise looks good.

        M.
-- 
Jazz is not dead. It just smells funny.

Reply via email to