Jan Engelhardt wrote: > On Jan 15 2007 09:39, Patrick McHardy wrote: > >>I'm not sure how well that will work (the IPv4/IPv6-specific stuff >>is spread over the entire target function), but its worth a try. > > > "Nothing is impossible." Since you happened to take that one for > yourself... well here's a q: would a patch be accepted that changes > all ipt and ip6t modules to the new xt? Even if a module is only for > ipv4 or ipv6, I think it makes sense to reduce the number of > different *t structures floating around.
If you're talking about using the xt-structures in net/ipv[46]/netfilter and removing the ipt/ip6t-wrappers, that would make sense IMO. - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED] More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
