On 05/04/2016 17:56, David Matlack wrote: > > I'm going to rerun the tests without this patch, as it seems the most > > likely culprit, and leave it out of the pull request if they pass. > > Agreed this is a very likely culprit. I think I see one way the > guest's xcr0 can leak into the host. I will do some testing an send > another version. Thanks.
Tests passed without this patch. Paolo