Joonsoo Kim <iamjoonsoo....@lge.com> writes: > [ text/plain ] > On Fri, Apr 01, 2016 at 11:10:07AM +0900, js1...@gmail.com wrote: >> From: Joonsoo Kim <iamjoonsoo....@lge.com> >> >> ZONE_MOVABLE could be treated as highmem so we need to consider it for >> accurate calculation of dirty pages. And, in following patches, ZONE_CMA >> will be introduced and it can be treated as highmem, too. So, instead of >> manually adding stat of ZONE_MOVABLE, looping all zones and check whether >> the zone is highmem or not and add stat of the zone which can be treated >> as highmem. >> >> Signed-off-by: Joonsoo Kim <iamjoonsoo....@lge.com> >> --- >> mm/page-writeback.c | 8 ++++++-- >> 1 file changed, 6 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-) > > Hello, Andrew. > > Could you review and merge these simple fixup and cleanup patches? > I'd like to send ZONE_CMA patchset v2 based on linux-next after this > series is merged to linux-next. >
I searched with ZONE_HIGHMEM and AFAICS this series do handle all the highmem path. For the series: Reviewed-by: Aneesh Kumar K.V <aneesh.ku...@linux.vnet.ibm.com> -aneesh
