On Mon, Apr 4, 2016 at 12:29 PM, Peter Hurley <pe...@hurleysoftware.com> wrote:
>
> Yeah, a straight revert of 520bd7a8b415 resumes normal service:
Ok, so we have that as an option.
> Should I send a proper revert?
Let's see if somebody can come up with a better serialization model.
We're only at rc2, and we now have a fallback fix, let's wait a week
or two to see if the mmc people can come up with something.
But maybe you can send me a revert patch around rc4 or so if the
problem still remains, ok?
Linus
