> 

        Thank you for the information.
        I will give it some thought and see if I can come up
        with something that will fit both bills...

        The problem is that the disks that I have are
        very wide-spread, I would imagine. Compaq is shipping
        them in their newer machines, so some compromise has
        to be arrived at.
        
        I will look into the matter further.
        Thanks again.

        cheers, 

        eamb

> On Thu, Nov 02, 2000 at 06:24:47PM -0600, Elizabeth Morris-Baker wrote:
> > > 
> > 
> >     Yes, I know that is in the spec, but truly,
> >     some scsi devices do act this way....
> >     Maybe they need to read the spec :>
> > 
> >     I have included the START_STOP for Matthew, but
> >     I never see it execute with the ATLAS disks...
> >     A diff follows for those that want to try it..
> > 
> >     cheers, 
> > 
> >     Elizabeth
> 
> Well, if I'm not all mistaken, this is the code that got removed earlier
> on from the kernel because it caused some SCSI-adapters to hang on
> scsi-scan?! If so, what's better: to follow the specs and penalise the
> bad guys, or ignore the specs and penalise the good guys...
> 
> 
> /David Weinehall
>   _                                                                 _
>  // David Weinehall <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> /> Northern lights wander      \\
> //  Project MCA Linux hacker        //  Dance across the winter sky //
> \>  http://www.acc.umu.se/~tao/    </   Full colour fire           </
> 

-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Reply via email to